Government’s Content Takedown Orders Are ‘Manifestly Arbitrary’ 3h583f Twitter Says in Court Petition

Twitter has also submitted that ‘ level Blocking Orders are in violation of Section 69A of the IT Act. 4m1uy

By ANI | Updated: 8 July 2022 17:30 IST

Photo Credit: Reuters 3v6d2p

Twitter said that the ministry has recently ordered to take down 1,474 s

Highlights

Twitter said that ministry has recently ordered to take down 175 tweets
The petitioner responded that it has complied with the Blocking Orders
Ministry has directed to block access to certain information

ment

Social media giant Twitter, while challenging multiple blocking orders issued by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, contended that the orders are manifestly arbitrary and procedurally and substantially not in consonance with Section 69A of the IT Act.

In a petition filed before the Karnataka High Court, Twitter said in these blocking orders, the IT Ministry has directed Twitter to block access by the public, to certain information which includes suspension of multiple s on Twitter.

Twitter said that the ministry has recently ordered to take down 1,474 s, and 175 tweets.

Twitter CoTweets Feature in Testing, Will Let s Co-Author a Tweet

The plea states that the ministry orders have not shown that these s contain content at least a majority of which falls within the narrowly tailored grounds of Section 69A.

"The Blocking Orders do not provide proper reasons as to how such content falls within the narrowly tailored grounds set out in Section 69A of the IT Act. The procedural safeguards under the Blocking Rules have also not been followed in the present case," Twitter said.

The plea further stated that the respondent ministry issued a letter dated June 27, 2022, directing the petitioner to comply, failing which respondents prescribe serious consequences against Petitioner (Twitter) i.e. withdrawal of the protection under Section 79(1) of the IT Act, as well as initiation of criminal proceedings under the provisions of the IT Act.

Elon Musk Says Doing 'Best' to Boost Birth Rates Amid Twins' Report

The petitioner responded that it has complied with the Blocking Orders under protest but objected to blocking directions in respect of 11 s. In response, on July 1, 2022, respondents issued a letter revoking their direction to block 10 Twitter s, said the Twitter petition.

The plea mentioned that, in 34 cases, the Blocking Orders seek that the petitioner block entire s. Section 69A provides the power to block 'information' and 'information' is defined in Section 2(1)(v) of the IT Act. The remit of Section 69A extends only to blocking 'information' that is already available and does not extend to preventing information from being generated, transmitted, received, stored or hosted. Therefore, the level Blocking Orders are in violation of Section 69A.

Without prejudice, Blocking Orders to withhold access to the entire cannot be issued without providing cogent reasons as to why such level blocking is necessary or expedient, Twitter submits that level blocking is a disproportionate measure and violates the rights of s under the constitution, said Twitter in the petition.

What are the best tablets? We discuss this on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.

Comments

For the latest reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.