Home
Apps
Apps News
Oracle Asks for $1.3 Billion Verdict Against SAP to Be Reinstated

Oracle Asks for $1.3 Billion Verdict Against SAP to Be Reinstated 3f1530

By Reuters | Updated: 14 May 2014 10:36 IST

ment

A U.S. appeals court appeared skeptical on Tuesday about reinstating a $1.3 billion jury verdict won by Oracle Corp against SAP, in a case where the European software company itted massive copyright infringement.

At a court hearing on Tuesday, two 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges also suggested Oracle may deserve more than the roughly $300 million it had been assigned by a lower court. 5w3821

A Northern California jury awarded SAP customers.

The trial between the two enterprise software competitors was widely watched at the time, as top Oracle executives Larry Ellison and Safra Catz testified. However, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California ruled that Oracle had proven actual damages of only $272 million.

Oracle has asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse that ruling.

At a court hearing on Tuesday before a three-judge 9th Circuit , Oracle attorney Kathleen Sullivan said internal SAP documents showed SAP had expected about $900 million in new revenue by using TomorrowNow to poach Oracle customers. That, and other evidence, was sufficient for the jury to arrive at its $1.3 billion figure, Sullivan argued.

However, 9th Circuit Judge Susan Graber questioned whether those SAP revenue figures were objective evidence of the value of the copyrighted material.

"It's hypothetical revenue information, which is not the same," Graber said.

"These may be pie in the sky dreaming," Judge William Fletcher added.

The judges did not issue a formal ruling from the bench. SAP eventually shuttered TomorrowNow, which pleaded guilty to criminal copyright infringement and other charges.

SAP itted liability for the s just prior to the 2010 trial, so the only issue in dispute was how much SAP would pay Oracle in damages. Oracle said that figure should be calculated based on what SAP would have paid Oracle had it licensed the materials, instead of ing them without permission. Oracle estimated that amount in the billions.

In her lower court ruling, however, Hamilton decided Oracle is only entitled to profits it had lost as a result of the s, as well as any profits SAP gained. The judge calculated that amount at $272 million.

At the 9th Circuit hearing on Tuesday, Graber said $272 million "seems low," and Fletcher said it "seems to me wrong."

SAP attorney Tharan "Greg" Lanier defended the amount, though he acknowledged that Oracle presented evidence at trial that the profits calculation could come to $487 million.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Oracle Corp et al. vs. SAP AG et al., 12-16944.

Comments

For the latest reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.